News Editorials |
Views |
Chairman’s
Desk |
Features In Focus |
Updates References Previous Issues |
Jerry B. Coloma
“What
we really care about, or what at least ought to care, is not our individual
welfare as separate beings but the triumph of causes which transcend our
personality”
Alfred Cyril Ewing
Predecessors and lawmakers were imbued with a
vision when RA 720 or the Rural Banking Act was enacted in 1952. They
envisioned rural banks and cooperatives like a phoenix, to spur growth from the
ashes of war. They agreed to the qualification that the Board of Directors,
above all, possesses a missionary outlook and devotion to their work. Perhaps to emulate the success of the Obras
Pias of the past. It was a dream anyway – a
noble and a needed one at a time. Dreamers were not lacking. There were 18
rural banks, within the year of the enactment of RA 720. For the first full
year, the total resources amounted to P2.4 million. It was reported that
deposits amounted to P2,000 and an aggregate loss of
P46,033 at the end of the year. Nevertheless, rural banks grew at a snail pace,
hardly making a dent in the national economy in terms of monies and improving
the lives of the majority in the rural areas. But the vision remains.
Fifty
years hence, as of end-June 2002, the combined resources of the rural and
cooperative banking system amount to P76.7 billion with rural banks dominating
the industry with a combined share of 93.5 percent. Deposit liabilities remain
to be the main source of funds for lending and investment operations. From a
diminutive number of 18 rural banks in 1953, there are now 1804 consisting of
727 head offices and 1,077 branches located all over the country. Rural Banks
have grown indeed, but not as envisioned. Reality checks that rural banks
including cooperatives are but 2.2% of the total banking system. What remains
significant is that when the 2.2% is translated in real terms – it means 70% of
the total clients served by the entire banking industry! Rural Banks serve the
most number of people – of which the majority is poor. Small
but numerous transactions. Tedious but matters much to the lives of the
rural folks. The significance is that given the opportunity – that 70%
clientele may seem or deemed as a force from where growth should spur, thereby
developing the economies.
And
the rural bank’s vision is to see that 70% clientele as most productive sector
of the society. It will not happen overnight. But as the saying goes, there is
a way if there is a will – and that is laying-down, continuing and adding on to
what pioneering rural bankers have started in the past. It means holding on to
that vision and doing what must be done. Plans and activities are not wanting.
Foremost
is the most needed amendment of the present R.A. 7353 or the Rural Banking Act
to resolve the issues, plug the loopholes, decrease financial cost of borrowers
and re-direct the flow of funds to the countryside. The amendment is now being
deliberated as HB 5115, introduced by Reps. Felix R. Alfelor,
Jr. and Herminio G. Teves,
in the Lower House and as SB 2355 by Sen. Ramon B. Magsaysay
in the Upper House.
Another
is linkage with private and government entitled to broaden the financial base
of the rural banks and to better serve the clientele – to serve themselves. Much like the story of providing the needy with fishing implements
rather than fish. A partnership with Land Bank of the
Once
in a dialogue with the rural and thrift bankers, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo said that for development to happen, there is a need to boost domestic demands and not to
be dependent on exports, hence her administration will give priority to SMEs. And usually, SMEs’ recourse
for financial requirements are rural banks. This is
where the government and the rural banks become allies for real countryside development.
In
the final analysis, what really matters is the vision that guides the present
actions to wards a better future.
News Editorials |
Views |
Chairman’s
Desk |
Features In Focus |
Updates References Previous Issues |